From owner-freebsd-chat Sun Dec 14 17:04:15 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id RAA00153 for chat-outgoing; Sun, 14 Dec 1997 17:04:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from kithrup.com (kithrup.com [205.179.156.40]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA00144 for ; Sun, 14 Dec 1997 17:04:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sef@kithrup.com) Received: (from sef@localhost) by kithrup.com (8.8.8/8.8.7) id QAA07285; Sun, 14 Dec 1997 16:45:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sef) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 1997 16:45:10 -0800 (PST) From: Sean Eric Fagan Message-Id: <199712150045.QAA07285@kithrup.com> To: chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Best kept "secrets" finally exposed In-Reply-To: <199712150005.QAA24409.kithrup.freebsd.bugs@hub.freebsd.org> Organization: Kithrup Enterprises, Ltd. Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > What computer stores don't want you to know is that a well made, [rest of spam deleted] It looks like the sendmail.cf rules on hub are incorrectly defined -- this should not have gotten past the RBL check. This would explain an earlier comment that the RBL rules had not resulted in any blocked messages. Also note that it came from a machine with no PTR record available -- so why didn't the earlier check get it? Has all spam checking been disabled on hub?