From owner-freebsd-multimedia Mon Mar 3 10:41:55 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA19971 for multimedia-outgoing; Mon, 3 Mar 1997 10:41:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from alpha.xerox.com (alpha.Xerox.COM [13.1.64.93]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id KAA19966 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 1997 10:41:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from crevenia.parc.xerox.com ([13.2.116.11]) by alpha.xerox.com with SMTP id <16885(6)>; Mon, 3 Mar 1997 10:37:18 PST Received: from localhost by crevenia.parc.xerox.com with SMTP id <177476>; Mon, 3 Mar 1997 10:36:53 -0800 To: Archie Cobbs cc: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Subject: Re: multicast firewall implications In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 02 Mar 97 18:28:27 PST." <199703030228.SAA23088@bubba.whistle.com> Date: Mon, 3 Mar 1997 10:36:44 PST From: Bill Fenner Message-Id: <97Mar3.103653pst.177476@crevenia.parc.xerox.com> Sender: owner-multimedia@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Archie Cobbs wrote: >Is it sufficient to open a hole in the firewall for all traffic between >A and B for IP protocol 4 (IP-in-IP) only? You also need IP protocol 2 (IGMP) for the DVMRP routing messages. >To what degree does opening this hole compromise the security of the >internal network? It allows multicast traffic destined for groups to which internal machines are joined to flow onto your network. >What non-multicast traffic is associated with multi-cast routing or >with the popular MBONE applications (sdr, vat, vic, etc.), if any? Just the tunnel traffic you mentioned above. >Do IP packets destined for 224.x.x.x ever "jump across" into normal >class A, B, or C addresses? Only through an application designed to do so. Bill