From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Nov 29 18:37:36 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id SAA19461
          for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 29 Nov 1996 18:37:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Mail.IDT.NET (mail.idt.net [198.4.75.205])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA19456
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 29 Nov 1996 18:37:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sequoia (ppp-17.ts-1.mlb.idt.net [169.132.71.17]) by Mail.IDT.NET (8.7.4/8.7.3) with SMTP id VAA25435; Fri, 29 Nov 1996 21:37:30 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <329F9E2B.1E49@mail.idt.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 1996 21:38:35 -0500
From: Gary Corcoran <garycorc@mail.idt.net>
Reply-To: garycorc@mail.idt.net
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Chuck Robey <chuckr@glue.umd.edu>
CC: hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Inferno for FreeBSD.
References: <Pine.OSF.3.95.961129181531.4983C-100000@modem.eng.umd.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Chuck Robey wrote:

> Excuse me, when I sent my post (with the included reply from Bell Labs) my
> mailer interpreted it as am incoming mail to me, and sent it back to me.
> Did anyone else get a trucated reply, without the included excerpt?
> 

Yes, received your mail without the included mail, then received
another email which looked as if it was from philw@plan9.bell-labs.com,
which contained what you intended to simply include.  Strange...

Gary