Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 19:07:45 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 199905] PCH bustage when building with GCC on -CURRENT kernel: fatal error: had to relocate PCH (7 ports) Message-ID: <bug-199905-13-B6CXS8dLde@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-199905-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-199905-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199905 --- Comment #18 from Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Dmitry Marakasov from comment #13) > (In reply to Jan Beich from comment #12) > As far as I remember, gcc from ports has some problems with precompiled > headers by itself. I've ran into it in games/redeclipse. > > Also, what are OSVERSION in which gcc was fixed? Actually I don't see > relevant commits to contrib/gcc even in HEAD. Am I looking in a wrong place? It hasn't been fixed. It needs to be, but doesn't change this PR at all as noted before. Sure an EN would be great if there was a fix for gcc and re@ cared enough to release it. I doubt they would deem it worth the effort. Even then I would still want the changes in this PR since it's not reasonable to expect people to have the latest EN installed to avoid a build error that is easily avoided and only was there for a slight build optimization. Also note that while this issue is appearing on 11, it has been a bug in GCC for over a decade IIRC. Just google for the issue and you'll find references to it for other systems as well. The GCC PCH errors did occur with FreeBSD <11 with boost quite often for me as well. The changes in 11 just make it more consistently obviously broken. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-199905-13-B6CXS8dLde>