Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 10:02:42 -0700 From: mdf@FreeBSD.org To: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD Arch <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: freebsd32_ioctl.c Message-ID: <AANLkTinHbtZbHWVf-CucjmJusCHpGzGsjxN%2BMQru4xVd@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20101007161338.GK2392@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <AANLkTinYascWzAn8dWMsKaDqcD0WuMr40=SJ_KX3Dfn0@mail.gmail.com> <20101007161338.GK2392@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>=A0Should we >> just be adding ioctl argument munging as we go along and not worry >> about the size? =A0Or is there simple way to keep the munging inside the >> driver? =A0Perhaps my making the driver's ioctl look something like: > I think that in-driver variant is the best. Okay, I am trying this approach. > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0if (SV_CURPROC_FLAG(SV_ILP32)) That's what I get for doing development on stable/7. I miss out on the existence of such handy things. Thanks! matthew
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTinHbtZbHWVf-CucjmJusCHpGzGsjxN%2BMQru4xVd>