From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Thu May 20 12:01:21 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BA0763D181 for ; Thu, 20 May 2021 12:01:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Fm7cd0nD7z3J9R for ; Thu, 20 May 2021 12:01:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 015C563CC65; Thu, 20 May 2021 12:01:21 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E85CF63CD7B for ; Thu, 20 May 2021 12:01:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fm7cc5jBWz3JJC for ; Thu, 20 May 2021 12:01:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5C9625B09 for ; Thu, 20 May 2021 12:01:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 14KC1KeS026431 for ; Thu, 20 May 2021 12:01:20 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 14KC1Kx2026430 for x11@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 20 May 2021 12:01:20 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 254350] graphics/libepoxy: update to 1.5.7 Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 12:01:20 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: jcfyecrayz@liamekaens.com X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: x11@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback+ X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 12:01:21 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D254350 --- Comment #21 from John Hein --- (In reply to Evgeniy Khramtsov from comment #19) Daniel means (I think) that we could use MASTER_SITES=3Dhttps://github.com/anholt/libepoxy/releases/tag/${PORTVERSIO= N}/.=20 In this case, we _will_ need to change PORTVERSION to DISTVERSION. USE_GIT= HUB & GH_* can be removed, too. Why to use a release tarball (feel free to ignore this if you already understand why)... Upstream generated an actual release tarball (often by building some sort of 'dist' target). The release tarball can be different than just the tarball= of the tagged source. For instance, it may have pre-generated documentation f= iles so you don't have to pull in big documentation processing package dependenc= ies and run tools to build/install docs. That's one reason (of various other reasons) to prefer an actual release tarball. On the other hand, if a rele= ase tarball is gigantic and full of unnecessary / undesired pieces, one might prefer just the tarball of the tagged source. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=