From owner-freebsd-security Sun Oct 1 4:36: 7 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mail.kyx.net (cr95838-b.crdva1.bc.wave.home.com [24.113.50.147]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C17837B502 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 04:36:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smp.kyx.net (unknown [10.22.22.45]) by mail.kyx.net (Postfix) with SMTP id A01BE1DC03; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 04:35:54 -0700 (PDT) From: Dragos Ruiu Organization: kyx.net To: "Andreas Alderud" , Subject: Re: Security and FreeBSD, my overall perspective Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2000 04:33:18 -0700 X-Mailer: KYX-CP/M [version core00-mail-92] Content-Type: text/plain References: <002401c02b99$a07a8ab0$6400a8c0@XGod> In-Reply-To: <002401c02b99$a07a8ab0$6400a8c0@XGod> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <0010010437162T.11814@smp.kyx.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, 01 Oct 2000, Andreas Alderud wrote: > I think it would be wise to have three ports of the ``same´´ package. > My idea is to have lets say -SECURE, -STABLE - and CURRENT (the same could > be done with FreeBSD itself). If you are going to unify the BSD ports please make sure there is a nice way to organize the ports subset onto a CD, image, transfer etc... I kinda like the lighter more stripped down - and therefore easier to manipulate OpenBSD ports tree... while the FreeBSD one is nice for comprehensiveness..... (Just so we don't start any religious debates here. :-) --dr To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message