Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 13:46:14 +0100 From: Fabian Keil <freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de> To: Karl Pielorz <kpielorz_lst@tdx.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Threaded 6.4 code compiled under 9.0 uses a lot more memory?.. Message-ID: <20121030134614.1a42f0e3@fabiankeil.de> In-Reply-To: <A92CE63E6E6DB93B366F4A42@MightyAtom.tdx.co.uk> References: <A92CE63E6E6DB93B366F4A42@MightyAtom.tdx.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Sig_/O_=1nr6K8G9W6NyUtrwbJUS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Karl Pielorz <kpielorz_lst@tdx.co.uk> wrote: > Can anyone think of any quick pointers as to why some code originally=20 > written under 6.4 amd64 - when re-compiled under 9.0-stable amd64 takes > up a *lot* more memory when running? 6.4 comes with phkmalloc while 9.0 uses jemalloc. Maybe you are allocating memory in a way that is less space-efficiently handled by jemalloc's default configuration. Fabian --Sig_/O_=1nr6K8G9W6NyUtrwbJUS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlCPzBoACgkQBYqIVf93VJ3T/gCfVUdIjii6Xms+s52XRXUg0sYe WOAAoJ+is+vl/Pa+qWorSwSbYY2TYGzi =+oWx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/O_=1nr6K8G9W6NyUtrwbJUS--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20121030134614.1a42f0e3>