Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 16:45:48 -0700 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com> To: Andriy Voskoboinyk <avos@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" <freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org> Cc: "src-committers@freebsd.org" <src-committers@freebsd.org>, "svn-src-all@freebsd.org" <svn-src-all@freebsd.org>, "svn-src-head@freebsd.org" <svn-src-head@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r300383 - head/sys/net80211 Message-ID: <CAJ-Vmo=g5vdxf%2BG%2By%2BCNZq%2BCRzgR0B_HZ8bCk-OnXUqTcK=5EQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmokqGUniojZEORv5yEY5BaEiVsra1ccfgmu-qf8_4mEkEQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <201605212321.u4LNLgDI029432@repo.freebsd.org> <op.yht5yd094dikkl@localhost> <CAJ-VmokqGUniojZEORv5yEY5BaEiVsra1ccfgmu-qf8_4mEkEQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Also, the scan code now also seems to alternate between g and n channels on 2ghz; and it never seems to update the chanlist if it's interrupted. So yeah, hm. Avos, any ideas? -adrian On 5 August 2016 at 16:42, Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Just a reminder and notice to others - yeah, I've found that this > actually stops scan from working well and reliably. > > Notably, I've found that we get a scan completion notification and > then we can't restart a subsequent scan for some reason. > > I may have to revert this and put in something slightly more explicit > - eg, we put on an explicit full scan timeout and we explicitly > complete the scan if we don't finish it in time. > > > -adrian > > > On 21 May 2016 at 16:24, Andriy Voskoboinyk <avos@freebsd.org> wrote: >> Tested with wpi(4) and urtwn(4) in STA mode. >>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-Vmo=g5vdxf%2BG%2By%2BCNZq%2BCRzgR0B_HZ8bCk-OnXUqTcK=5EQ>