From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 26 17:07:38 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ED3516A4B3 for ; Fri, 26 Sep 2003 17:07:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp3.sentex.ca (smtp3.sentex.ca [64.7.153.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E93EC4402A for ; Fri, 26 Sep 2003 17:07:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from smtp1.sentex.ca (smtp1.sentex.ca [199.212.134.4]) by smtp3.sentex.ca (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h8R07UHr041083; Fri, 26 Sep 2003 20:07:30 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from BLUELAPIS.sentex.ca (cage.simianscience.com [64.7.134.1]) by smtp1.sentex.ca (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with SMTP id h8R07YOB051243; Fri, 26 Sep 2003 20:07:34 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) From: Mike Tancsa To: Glenn Johnson Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 20:07:38 -0400 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Something is wrong with the fxp network driver X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 00:07:38 -0000 Are they Tyan motherboards by chance ? There was a thread in stable about this a few weeks ago. The problems seem specific to those motherboards. Someone posted a potential workaround as well. ---Mike On Fri, 26 Sep 2003 11:40:08 -0500, in sentex.lists.freebsd.current you wrote: >I am having a problem with recent builds of -current with the fxp >driver. A couple of days ago, the 6 machines in my cluster with fxp >interfaces all died at about the same time with fxp timeout errors. The >machines with 3Com xl interfaces kept on going. Today, I am observing >that the throughput is about half of what I am seeing on my machines >with a 3Com xl interface. Is anybody else observing this? What other >information do I need to provide? > >Thanks.