Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 21 Dec 2016 21:54:36 -0700
From:      Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
To:        Ed Schouten <ed@nuxi.nl>
Cc:        Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com>, Ed Schouten <ed@freebsd.org>,  "src-committers@freebsd.org" <src-committers@freebsd.org>,  "svn-src-all@freebsd.org" <svn-src-all@freebsd.org>,  "svn-src-head@freebsd.org" <svn-src-head@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r310354 - in head/usr.sbin: . prometheus_sysctl_exporter
Message-ID:  <CANCZdfq7YcihQmXPWXQqOedEE3V_SAwnW0dhuaXL0Cj=pgsn1A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABh_MKkQo72NB=U-5nAHgxEeCcsmQekzPTN2NaZp9aiD1BOrMA@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <201612210829.uBL8Tijt041811@repo.freebsd.org> <CAJ-VmoksTgmNY1AeYRJV5UN7%2Bew%2BqDgL63_=1Aaa7AQbyrLOhQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABh_MKkQo72NB=U-5nAHgxEeCcsmQekzPTN2NaZp9aiD1BOrMA@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Ed Schouten <ed@nuxi.nl> wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
>
> 2016-12-21 18:32 GMT+01:00 Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com>:
>> Maybe just "sysctl_export" would be fine.
>
> Good point. Almost all Prometheus metrics exporters use this naming scheme:
>
> ~80%: ${foo}_exporter
> ~20%: prometheus_${foo}_exporter
>
> Examples;
>
> - https://github.com/prometheus/node_exporter
> - https://github.com/ewr/elasticsearch_exporter
> - https://github.com/jonnenauha/prometheus_varnish_exporter
>
> The reason why I went for the 'prometheus_' prefix was mainly because
> of the following totally subjective reasons:
>
> - I didn't want to wreck tab completion. Right now if you type in
> 'sysc' and press tab, it tends to complete to 'sysctl'.
> - This tool is part of the base system, meaning that it will be
> present even if the user did nothing special. This is why I wanted the
> name to be a bit more self-documenting.
> - Thinking ahead: what if we're going to add exporters for other
> things as well? E.g., for Sendmail, sshd, ftpd, HAST, etc. In that
> case it would be nicer if those exporters shared a common prefix.
>
> That said, if people truly think it's a good idea to call this
> sysctl_exporter instead, then I wouldn't mind renaming it.
>
> Thoughts? Opinions?

sysctl_ anything will have my rage filled tab completion beeps sending
hate your way for years to come. Please don't do that :)

Warner



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CANCZdfq7YcihQmXPWXQqOedEE3V_SAwnW0dhuaXL0Cj=pgsn1A>