Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 13:33:42 -0400 From: Mikhail Teterin <mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> To: Eric Anderson <anderson@centtech.com> Cc: fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: heavy NFS writes lead to corrup summary in superblock Message-ID: <200606091333.42619.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com> In-Reply-To: <4489AF86.2080901@centtech.com> References: <20060609065656.31225.qmail@web30313.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <200606091313.04913.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com> <4489AF86.2080901@centtech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
п'ятниця 09 червень 2006 13:27, Eric Anderson написав: > Just curious - what NFS mount options are being used, The fs is accessed by the remote client machines (mostly -- Solaris) via automounters -- with the default parameters. > and are you changing any sysctl's (vfs/nfs related)? No, should I? -mi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200606091333.42619.mi%2Bmx>