Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 9 Jun 2006 13:33:42 -0400
From:      Mikhail Teterin <mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com>
To:        Eric Anderson <anderson@centtech.com>
Cc:        fs@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: heavy NFS writes lead to corrup summary in superblock
Message-ID:  <200606091333.42619.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com>
In-Reply-To: <4489AF86.2080901@centtech.com>
References:  <20060609065656.31225.qmail@web30313.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <200606091313.04913.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com> <4489AF86.2080901@centtech.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
п'ятниця 09 червень 2006 13:27, Eric Anderson написав:
> Just curious - what NFS mount options are being used, 

The fs is accessed by the remote client machines (mostly -- Solaris) via 
automounters -- with the default parameters.

> and are you changing any sysctl's (vfs/nfs related)?

No, should I?

	-mi



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200606091333.42619.mi%2Bmx>