From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Dec 13 6:52:36 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from squall.waterspout.com (squall.waterspout.com [208.13.56.12]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBD2137B416; Thu, 13 Dec 2001 06:52:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by squall.waterspout.com (Postfix, from userid 1050) id 3C48F9B08; Thu, 13 Dec 2001 09:50:33 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 09:50:33 -0500 From: Will Andrews To: Jim Mock Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/mutt-devel/files patch-14 Message-ID: <20011213095033.F30626@squall.waterspout.com> Reply-To: Will Andrews Mail-Followup-To: Jim Mock , ports@FreeBSD.org References: <200112111109.fBBB9Jv78403@freefall.freebsd.org> <20011212164738.GC65834@shall.anarcat.dyndns.org> <20011212203619.GA17909@helios.soupnazi.org> <20011212171808.T73885@bsd.havk.org> <20011213013354.GA63757@helios.soupnazi.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20011213013354.GA63757@helios.soupnazi.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 05:33:54PM -0800, Jim Mock wrote: > > > This is a cosmetic fix only. It doesn't add or remove any > > > functionality. > > > > It is a cosmetic fix that fixes a bug and deserves a PORTREVISION > > bump IMHO. > > Fair enough. Speaking of which, maybe we need to adopt a policy that more aggressively uses PORTREVISION/PORTEPOCH? Does it really hurt anything to bump these numbers? -- wca To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message