From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun May  4 14:23:20 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id F1B9F37B401; Sun,  4 May 2003 14:23:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id A3B9443F75; Sun,  4 May 2003 14:23:19 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from murray@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (murray@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h44LNJUp046886;
	Sun, 4 May 2003 14:23:19 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from murray@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from murray@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h44LNJmt046882;
	Sun, 4 May 2003 14:23:19 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 4 May 2003 14:23:19 -0700 (PDT)
From: Murray Stokely <murray@FreeBSD.org>
Message-Id: <200305042123.h44LNJmt046882@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: J.Kois@web.de, murray@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: docs/51658: [PATCH] - PR docs/50665 - fix suggestion
X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Documentation project <freebsd-doc.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-doc>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-doc@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 May 2003 21:23:20 -0000

Synopsis: [PATCH] - PR docs/50665 - fix suggestion

State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: murray
State-Changed-When: Sun May 4 14:21:03 PDT 2003
State-Changed-Why: 
Thanks for the submission.  An <example> isn't really appropriate for
this testimonial either, as it could then show up in the list of
examples after the table of contents and the assumption is that it
generally provides a procedure that can be followed to accomplish a
task.

latency was mispelled once in this patch, so I fixed this and
simplified the sentence about the bridge adding latency to ping times.
I think that is all that is really required now that I think about it.
It's a more useful statement than the Pentium 90 numbers that show the
latency that was added.

It may be up to 24 hours before this change is available on the web site.

Thanks!


http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=51658