From owner-freebsd-questions  Wed May  6 13:15:34 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA10764
          for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Wed, 6 May 1998 13:15:34 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from gdi.uoregon.edu (gdi.uoregon.edu [128.223.170.30])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA10717
          for <questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 6 May 1998 13:15:22 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from dwhite@gdi.uoregon.edu)
Received: from localhost (dwhite@localhost)
          by gdi.uoregon.edu (8.8.7/8.8.8) with SMTP id NAA10918;
          Wed, 6 May 1998 13:13:09 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from dwhite@gdi.uoregon.edu)
Date: Wed, 6 May 1998 13:13:09 -0700 (PDT)
From: Doug White <dwhite@gdi.uoregon.edu>
Reply-To: Doug White <dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu>
To: Nathan Dorfman <nathan@rtfm.net>
cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: lpd breakage
In-Reply-To: <19980506144302.A15179@rtfm.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980506131216.10811T-100000@gdi.uoregon.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Wed, 6 May 1998, Nathan Dorfman wrote:

> On Wed, May 06, 1998 at 11:08:57AM -0700, Doug White wrote:
> > On Tue, 5 May 1998, Nathan Dorfman wrote:
> > 
> > > Every time I try to lpr a file, I get this:
> > > 
> > > May  5 20:29:39 limbo lpd[8543]: restarting lp
> >                                               ^^  er?
> > We don't have an lp command.
> 
> That's the printer. Its name is lp.

Oh, duh.

> The problem was that apsfilter
> launches gs to print PS on a non-PS printer. After turning on some
> verbose logging in apsfilter itself, I saw that gs would not load.

That's what I thought.

> ld.so complained about libXt.so.6.0, which a) exists and b) loads
> happily when I run the same gs with the same options from the good
> old command line. This problem only shows up with the ghostscript
> port, which I accidentally installed instead of ghostscript5. With
> 2.6.2 removed and 5.10 installed, it works fine again.

Hm, GS wants X.  Try building the port so you don't get the X support.  

2.6.2 had *ugly* fonts (unless you found a way to replace them).

Doug White                              | University of Oregon  
Internet:  dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu    | Residence Networking Assistant
http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite    | Computer Science Major



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message