From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 26 05:34:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A677A16A4CE for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 05:34:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D5DC043D31 for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 05:34:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from turbo23@gmx.net) Received: (qmail 431 invoked by uid 65534); 26 Feb 2004 13:33:59 -0000 Received: from bert.mlan.solnet.ch (HELO bert.mlan.solnet.ch) (212.101.1.83) by mail.gmx.net (mp027) with SMTP; 26 Feb 2004 14:33:59 +0100 X-Authenticated: #627573 Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 14:33:50 +0100 From: Thomas Vogt To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20040226143350.24a35dc1@bert.mlan.solnet.ch> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.9claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: p2p traffic X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 13:34:01 -0000 Hello I'm thinking about the p2p network problem. P2p creates a lot of traffic. I don't care if my backbone is full but not only with p2p traffic. Atm I do some queueing with dummynet for the well known p2p ports. But this looks not sufficient. Is there another, perhaps better solution to decrease the p2p traffic? Blocking is no alternative. Another problem is that new p2p clients uses port 80. So it's very difficult to reconize the p2p traffic. regards Thomas Vogt