From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jan 10 21:41:26 2008
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033)
	id 3545216A421; Thu, 10 Jan 2008 21:41:26 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 21:41:26 +0000
From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
To: Martin Wilke <miwi@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <20080110214126.GA39859@FreeBSD.org>
References: <200712310028.lBV0S5On056424@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<20080110124041.GC80526@heechee.tobez.org>
	<20080110200027.GB73598@bsdcrew.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20080110200027.GB73598@bsdcrew.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, peter@vereshagin.org,
	gabor@freebsd.org, portmgr@freebsd.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org,
	yarodin@gmail.com, Anton Berezin <tobez@tobez.org>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/www Makefile ports/www/p5-FCGI-ProcManager
	Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 21:41:26 -0000

On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 09:00:27PM +0100, Martin Wilke wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 01:40:41PM +0100, Anton Berezin wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 12:28:05AM +0000, Martin Wilke wrote:
> > Why this ever got added?  There is an identical port
> > www/p5-FastCGI-ProcManager.  Now we are getting PRs with updates to this one
> > (see 119300), where PR authors *complain* about someone updating "the wrong
> > port", refering to gabor's update of www/p5-FastCGI-ProcManager recently...
> > 
> > What a mess.  I'd like committers adding new ports to be a *bit* more
> > careful and verify that the port is indeed *new*.
> > 
> > It can be argued that the "new" name is better that the "old" one, but this
> > is an entirely separate can of worm.  Grrrr.
> > 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> After a discussion with tobez on irc, we have made plans to remove
> www/p5-FastCGI-ProcManager after the slush. The new Port make more
> sense and have a Maintainer.

As a side note: doesn't `FastCGI' look as a better name?  We already
have `www/p5-FastCGI' and `www/p5-FastCGI-ProcManager', and only one
`www/p5-FCGI-Async'.  Maybe the latter should just be repocopied to
match the former ones?

Just my $.02.

./danfe