From owner-cvs-all Wed Apr 10 6: 2:54 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mailman.zeta.org.au (mailman.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.16]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C85D237B404; Wed, 10 Apr 2002 06:02:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bde.zeta.org.au (bde.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.102]) by mailman.zeta.org.au (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA28575; Wed, 10 Apr 2002 23:02:42 +1000 Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 23:02:53 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans X-X-Sender: bde@gamplex.bde.org To: Brian Somers Cc: Brian Somers , , Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/digi digi.c In-Reply-To: <200204101157.g3ABveOF052165@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org> Message-ID: <20020410225848.O527-100000@gamplex.bde.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Brian Somers wrote: > [bde wrote] > > ... > > N * (+14 -5) in N drivers. All drivers that support dynamic loading need > > something like this, since busy-waiting on running systems is unacceptable. > > Not that I will ever want to use this misfeature. > > Perhaps we just need to rename digi_delay() to delay() and put it > somewhere more interesting ? I think delay() is reserved for renaming DELAY() :-). NetBSD has delay() but still has DELAY() which is implemented as delay(). At least in a 2+ year old version. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message