From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 25 22:31:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF3E516A403 for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 22:31:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca (smarthost1.sentex.ca [64.7.153.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A62C43D46 for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 22:30:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from lava.sentex.ca (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18]) by smarthost1.sentex.ca (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kAPMVKGU069232; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 17:31:20 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from mdt-xp.sentex.net (simeon.sentex.ca [192.168.43.27]) by lava.sentex.ca (8.13.6/8.13.3) with ESMTP id kAPMVJKX018453 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 25 Nov 2006 17:31:19 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <200611252231.kAPMVJKX018453@lava.sentex.ca> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 17:31:27 -0500 To: "Nick Pavlica" From: Mike Tancsa In-Reply-To: References: <4557CECD.2000609@samsco.org> <200611130454.kAD4sZwe041556@lava.sentex.ca> <4557FF7A.8020704@samsco.org> <200611132054.kADKsFvK045726@lava.sentex.ca> <4558E3DC.6080800@samsco.org> <200611200454.kAK4sdat083568@lava.sentex.ca> <7.1.0.9.0.20061120160757.14d4a728@sentex.net> <200611220247.kAM2l9JP095066@lava.sentex.ca> <20061122130947.GM20405@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <200611231652.kANGqJsr005016@lava.sentex.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.3, clamav-milter version 0.88.3 on clamscanner2 X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 22:31:21 -0000 At 02:12 PM 11/25/2006, Nick Pavlica wrote: >>I might give OpenBSD a quick try as a reference. > >Mike, > Have you done any testing on Solaris 10, or OpenSolaris? I >understand that it has a very robust IP stack. It would be >interesting to see how the three stack up against each other (FBSD, >LINUS, SunOS). I installed OpenSolaris elsewhere this week. Yeah, might be interesting to try out. I will give it a test on Monday if the NICs are supported. ipfilter seems to be the firewall software. ---Mike