From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Jul 22 21:32:06 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id VAA12983 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 22 Jul 1996 21:32:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from walkabout.asstdc.com.au (root@walkabout.asstdc.com.au [202.12.127.73]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA12974 for ; Mon, 22 Jul 1996 21:32:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from imb@localhost) by walkabout.asstdc.com.au (8.7.5/BSD4.4) id OAA00208 Tue, 23 Jul 1996 14:31:52 +1000 (EST) From: michael butler Message-Id: <199607230431.OAA00208@walkabout.asstdc.com.au> Subject: Re: patch for 2.1.0 To: hasty@rah.star-gate.com (Amancio Hasty) Date: Tue, 23 Jul 1996 14:31:52 +1000 (EST) Cc: hackers@freebsd.org, ssachs@george.lbl.gov In-Reply-To: <199607222237.PAA04334@rah.star-gate.com> from Amancio Hasty at "Jul 22, 96 03:37:44 pm" X-Comment: Phone 0419-240-180, International +61-419-240-180 X-Comment: finger imb@asstdc.com.au for PGP public key X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL22 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Say whats the scoop on the ep driver and ip multicast for 2.1? 2.1.5 has this (and many other things) fixed :-) > Would it be easier to just upgrade to 2.2? If "mission-critical", no .. if to be used as a system to teach, probably not (2.1.5 + kerberos-related patch is sufficient for most). If to be used by people who know the difference between their own programming errors and problems with the distributed utilities and/or kernel .. use -current *and* subscribe to the current mailing list. Also note that, unless you *really* know what you're doing, "backing out" an upgrade to -current usually requires: i) a tape drive and ii) a backup of what it was before .. :-) .. or a re-install. Hope this helps, michael