From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 26 09:47:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 651BA16A4CE for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 09:47:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from fep03-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com (fep03-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com [66.185.86.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC98743D2D for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 09:47:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: from win2000 ([63.139.3.63]) by fep03-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.comESMTP <20040226174711.WEEU189272.fep03-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com@win2000>; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 12:47:11 -0500 From: "Mike Jakubik" To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?'Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav'?= Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 12:47:50 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 In-Reply-To: Thread-Index: AcP8j28KtS7djLn6Q+uP2jtPccMzJgAANuNA X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH LOGIN at fep03-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com from [63.139.3.63] using ID at Thu, 26 Feb 2004 12:47:11 -0500 Message-Id: <20040226174711.WEEU189272.fep03-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com@win2000> cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: RE: sshd_config 1.35 commit X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 17:47:18 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav [mailto:des@des.no]=20 > Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 12:39 PM > To: Mike Jakubik > Cc: current@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: sshd_config 1.35 commit >=20 > I'm=20 > > not going to memorize all my clients logins, and waste time typing=20 > > them in. Its a pain in the ass and a waste of time. How=20 > come this PAM=20 > > circumvention >=20 > I agree. That's why I use key authentication. Maybe you should too. >=20 I guess I will be switching to key authentication then. But any ideas = why SecureCRT would prompt me twice for the password when using keyboard-interactive?