From owner-freebsd-bugs  Mon Oct 21 12:46:18 1996
Return-Path: owner-bugs
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id MAA06596
          for bugs-outgoing; Mon, 21 Oct 1996 12:46:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.19])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id MAA06586
          for <bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 21 Oct 1996 12:46:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from bde@localhost) by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.7.6/8.6.9) id FAA26570; Tue, 22 Oct 1996 05:43:02 +1000
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 1996 05:43:02 +1000
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Message-Id: <199610211943.FAA26570@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
To: bugs@FreeBSD.org, markson@osmosys.incog.com
Subject: Re: Two bugs
Sender: owner-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>I've found a couple of bugs.  I was trying to port our SKIP IP layer
>encryption software which runs fine on 2.1.5 to 2.2 and ran into a 
>couple of things.
>
>If you're compiling a kernel module and include <sys/conf.h>, you'll get
>an error about a missing include file <machine/ioconf.h>.   It is
>referenced in <machine/conf.h>

This is handled in bsd.kmod.mk.

>A second thing is the LKM interface.  Has the interface changed?  Is
>_init no longer being used as the entry point?

The entry points can be whatever you want, but the standard macros
generate slightly different name.

>A third note on a different level.  I want to install a 2.1.5 partition
>on a machine and a 2.2 partition.   Is this possible?  It seems to mount
>/dev/wd0a as root, which means it will always find one root file system
>or another...

2.2 partitioning is identical with 2.1.5 partitioning.  It mounts whatever
you tell it.

Bruce