From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Aug 28 10:42:37 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from feral.com (feral.com [192.67.166.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D9DA156A2 for ; Sat, 28 Aug 1999 10:42:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mjacob@feral.com) Received: from semuta.feral.com (semuta [192.67.166.70]) by feral.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA02346; Sat, 28 Aug 1999 10:40:49 -0700 Date: Sat, 28 Aug 1999 10:40:48 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Jacob Reply-To: mjacob@feral.com To: Julian Elischer Cc: Matthew Dillon , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Should cam_imask be part of bio_imask ? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Isn't all the work in CAM done at splsoftcam? Not all. There's completions done at splcam. I've had some worries and concerns about this, but (wince) I really have to admit that the ins and outs of the cam code often escape me, and they're documented only in the DNA of certain human subspecies that reside in Colorado..... > (or am I thinking of old code) > It starts off an ISR similar to the netisr doesn't it? > > On Sat, 28 Aug 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote: > > > I'm trying to track down some VFS/BIO corruption on an NFS server > > being tested under heavy loads and noticed that my SCSI interrupts > > do not appear to be blocked by splbio(). > > > > (The adaptec's are on irq 5 and irq 12) > > > > (kgdb) print bio_imask > > $1 = 0x40080040 > > (kgdb) print cam_imask > > $2 = 0x400c1020 > > (kgdb) > > > > This doesn't sound right to me. > > > > -Matt > > Matthew Dillon > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message