From owner-freebsd-current  Mon Oct 30 23:26:39 1995
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id XAA25613
          for current-outgoing; Mon, 30 Oct 1995 23:26:39 -0800
Received: from ref.tfs.com (ref.tfs.com [140.145.254.251])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id XAA25604
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Mon, 30 Oct 1995 23:26:36 -0800
Received: (from julian@localhost) by ref.tfs.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id XAA14925; Mon, 30 Oct 1995 23:25:42 -0800
From: Julian Elischer <julian@ref.tfs.com>
Message-Id: <199510310725.XAA14925@ref.tfs.com>
Subject: Re: *MORE* FS problems, please fix!
To: dyson@freefall.freebsd.org (John Dyson)
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 1995 23:25:42 -0800 (PST)
Cc: jdl@chromatic.com, terry@lambert.org, current@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <199510310456.UAA13740@freefall.freebsd.org> from "John Dyson" at Oct 30, 95 08:56:10 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 888       
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> 
> > 
> >
> I don't want to "piss" Terry off either, but I haven't included
> any structural changes without peer-review, and I am not likely
> to either.  You would not believe DG's and my phone bills.  Mine
> has been as high as $600/mo talking to DG!!!  Not because DG is
> "better" than me or more "experienced" than me (he isn't, he is
> different than me and can spend more time thinking about architectural
> issues than I can sometimes), but I do talk to him ALOT, keeping him
> up-to-date on proposed changes.

I think this is what we need with terry sometimes.
he seems 'out of the loop' too much

> I think the problem is with mis-communication and mis-understanding
> on the part of the parties involved.  IT will work out, because the
> parties do have the best intentions.

well that's true..
I know I want terry on our team not working off on his own somewhere..

julian