From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 9 18:52:01 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3706F3CD; Fri, 9 Nov 2012 18:52:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yanegomi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oa0-f54.google.com (mail-oa0-f54.google.com [209.85.219.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B96418FC0C; Fri, 9 Nov 2012 18:52:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id n9so5453572oag.13 for ; Fri, 09 Nov 2012 10:52:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=LJoh+VwYA4tE8CedIfU996bgUbeHpXQSYpETZdO53PM=; b=eR3YpuZrmybNPoxtyn/qPOyoRX0/Tqku41gmdqNM+ln7jxl7Qr1dW9hZk32Pi7zoGd yc1C14IImKmuIvPtAdeDXj5v2Nesqmt7qHFj8rC6VkKDejpzDfZCbSLR1FPAcyhyV0jF 3978ZCNY0duHkRjsEPFrQm0mf7pdKYO8Smhvj0ySbmTrSdTpeq+ZhnjJ9g3ZFmJet9mz 06TidZ4O1qFIXRb8EA6RzpI6xwJqU38/JR/ELybe/vjH3cTtZXCfcQn9+3rxBrJzZbJt 1L07zzoqxMeQRV4n53RO61CEIN2WLBF1cR0NU9n0x9SSy5SJdO6BZYNjbBACVIL4+DQM W13A== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.7.41 with SMTP id g9mr8363614oea.18.1352487120016; Fri, 09 Nov 2012 10:52:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.76.143.33 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Nov 2012 10:51:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <201211082303.qA8N3RlN031977@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 10:51:59 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm From: Garrett Cooper To: Doug Brewer Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: arm@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Tinderbox , current@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 18:52:01 -0000 On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 7:34 AM, Doug Brewer wrote: > No offence, but how many times did you break the build? Could you please > compile your code before committing next time? Thanks a lot! > make tinderbox is the important point here because it uses different compile time options and flags that Adrian doesn't probably have set in his KERNCONF -- assuming that the default KERNCONFs haven't been mangled on his system, in which case it messes up this statement; [un]fortunately someone can change GENERIC, etc on his/her box, run make tinderbox and have it pass, then . In which case I would recommend the following [just to be safe]: 1. Custom KERNCONF that includes a generic one. 2. make tinderbox -DMAKE_JUST_KERNELS before performing commits with just ARM/x86 and a select KERNCONF as a smoke test, and a more extensive make tinderbox when doing a more major commit. Thoughts? Thanks! -Garrett