From owner-svn-src-all@freebsd.org Tue Dec 20 04:21:09 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A6D8C876F7; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 04:21:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.baldwin.cx (bigwig.baldwin.cx [96.47.65.170]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF8D81766; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 04:21:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from ralph.baldwin.cx (c-73-231-226-104.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.231.226.104]) by mail.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 66D0B10A980; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 23:21:06 -0500 (EST) From: John Baldwin To: Adrian Chadd Cc: Eric van Gyzen , Warner Losh , Dimitry Andric , Baptiste Daroussin , "Conrad E. Meyer" , src-committers , "svn-src-all@freebsd.org" , "svn-src-head@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: svn commit: r310138 - head/lib/libc/stdio Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 20:10:13 -0800 Message-ID: <247095068.jHM79JMCGm@ralph.baldwin.cx> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (FreeBSD/11.0-PRERELEASE; KDE/4.14.10; amd64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <201612160144.uBG1ipjW016736@repo.freebsd.org> <49460793.UcUNovQMDa@ralph.baldwin.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (mail.baldwin.cx); Mon, 19 Dec 2016 23:21:06 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.2 at mail.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 04:21:09 -0000 On Monday, December 19, 2016 02:23:08 PM Adrian Chadd wrote: > [snip] > > tl;dr - can we revert it from stdio for now so we don't end up having > people use this? I agree with that. I think in userland something like snprintb() is ok. In the kernel I'd rather keep '%b'. -- John Baldwin