From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Dec 6 09:09:04 1995 Return-Path: owner-ports Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id JAA01273 for ports-outgoing; Wed, 6 Dec 1995 09:09:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from ubiq.veda.is (root@ubiq.veda.is [193.4.230.60]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id JAA01266 for ; Wed, 6 Dec 1995 09:08:58 -0800 (PST) Received: (from adam@localhost) by ubiq.veda.is (8.6.12/8.6.9) id RAA09225; Wed, 6 Dec 1995 17:08:27 GMT From: Adam David Message-Id: <199512061708.RAA09225@ubiq.veda.is> Subject: Re: nntpxfer Exectable File Missing To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 1995 17:08:26 +0000 (GMT) Cc: rjiang@akbs.com, ports@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <199512050851.AAA01085@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> from "Satoshi Asami" at Dec 5, 95 00:51:21 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 ME8a] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > * I downloaded nntp-1.5.11.5 (with C News) from your ftp server under > * packages-2.1 directory. After I extracted the nntp-1.5.11.5 using > * pkg_add command, I think I am missing nntpxfer exectable file under > * /usr/local/libexec/news/nntpxfer? Thanks in advance. > > I took a look, it seems like this is intentional (patches/patch-aa > explicitly ignores nntpxfer). Yes, it was intentional. I ported the nntp server only, and nntpxfer is a client program. It is a simple matter to add nntpxfer to the build and the packing list. Shall I do this? Of course, it will not change the fact that nntpxfer is missing from your present package file. -- Adam David