From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 3 15:51:51 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: doc@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEAA1106564A for ; Thu, 3 Apr 2008 15:51:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marc@blackend.org) Received: from abigail.blackend.org (ns0.blackend.org [82.227.222.164]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44B0F8FC1F for ; Thu, 3 Apr 2008 15:51:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marc@blackend.org) Received: from abigail.blackend.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by abigail.blackend.org (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m33Fplkm057751; Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:51:47 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marc@abigail.blackend.org) Received: (from marc@localhost) by abigail.blackend.org (8.13.4/8.13.3/Submit) id m33FplH6057750; Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:51:47 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marc) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:51:47 +0200 From: Marc Fonvieille To: Anatolij Shkodin Message-ID: <20080403155147.GA57646@abigail.blackend.org> References: <47F4A87D.4000107@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <47F4A87D.4000107@gmail.com> X-Useless-Header: blackend.org X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.11-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Possible update to handbook? X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2008 15:51:51 -0000 On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 12:50:53PM +0300, Anatolij Shkodin wrote: > FreeBSD handbook section: > 6.2.4 Firefox, Mozilla and MacromediaŽ Flash??? plugin > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/desktop-browsers.html > > ----- > > I think the section might be old. It is possible to install the > www/linux-flashplugin9 port (instead of www/linux-flashplugin7) by using > nspluginwrapper, following the instructions provided at > but does it works? I mean: is the linux-flashplugin9 stable? I read many things about the fact people should stick to linux-flashplugin7. > http://www.erikd.se/freebsd/freebsd-flash-in-firefox/ > This document is about linux-flashplugin7 not linux-flashplugin9. To sum up: it's Ok to change the current doc for www/nspluginwrapper since this one can be used under both i386/amd64 arch. But regarding the flashplugin version, the linux-flashplugin7 is known to be stable (most of time) but I'm not sure the same can be said for linux-flashplugin9. -- Marc