From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 30 05:24:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CBE716A407; Mon, 30 Oct 2006 05:24:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=julian=45182861c@elischer.org) Received: from a50.ironport.com (a50.ironport.com [63.251.108.112]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB3D943D5A; Mon, 30 Oct 2006 05:24:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from prvs=julian=45182861c@elischer.org) Received: from unknown (HELO [192.168.2.4]) ([10.251.60.124]) by a50.ironport.com with ESMTP; 29 Oct 2006 21:24:15 -0800 Message-ID: <45458C7E.50104@elischer.org> Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 21:24:14 -0800 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Macintosh/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg Lewis References: <917908193.20061027102647@serebryakov.spb.ru> <20061027103924.F79313@fledge.watson.org> <45426071.7020403@elischer.org> <602423478.20061028001449@serebryakov.spb.ru> <4542896D.1050001@elischer.org> <20061027231642.GJ30707@riyal.ugcs.caltech.edu> <45429703.8070305@elischer.org> <20061028104741.Q69980@fledge.watson.org> <45442A35.2030803@elischer.org> <20061029090309.T27107@fledge.watson.org> <20061029182108.GA46604@misty.eyesbeyond.com> In-Reply-To: <20061029182108.GA46604@misty.eyesbeyond.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Lev Serebryakov , Paul Allen , Robert Watson , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: KSE, libpthread & libthr: almost newbie question X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 05:24:16 -0000 Greg Lewis wrote: > If you really want to know, just send the running process a SIGQUIT and > it will dump the currently running threads to stdout. But yes, 1.4 and 1.5 > both use "native" threads which correspond 1:1 with OS threads (plus > there are threads the JVM creates itself, as you note). The JVM threads > include garbage collection and AWT event handlers at least. > I gather it doesn't use libpthread, but rather just the syscalls?