From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 26 17:09:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20B2216A5A6 for ; Sun, 26 Nov 2006 17:09:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-03.mxes.net (mxout-03.mxes.net [216.86.168.178]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA0D743D94 for ; Sun, 26 Nov 2006 17:06:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.localdomain (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 784965194B for ; Sun, 26 Nov 2006 12:07:00 -0500 (EST) From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 17:06:57 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <499c70c0611260212sa53a2bcq6345f063b7bfdddf@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611261706.57754.fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com> Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.2: ULE vs 4BSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 17:09:19 -0000 On Sunday 26 November 2006 12:18, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > On 11/26/06, John Smith wrote: > > Hello, > > > > What shall I use as a scheduler on it? 4BSD or ULE? > > The general consensus is you should not touch ULE unless > you're a developer willing to fix some outstanding issues and > maybe take active maintainership of it. I think that's a bit strong. I've used both, off and on, on my Desktop machine and not seen any real difference.