From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 29 10:42:51 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from binnacle.wantabe.com (binnacle.wantabe.com [209.16.8.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C0B614D53 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 1999 10:42:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jeffrl@wantabe.com) Received: from localhost (jeffrl@localhost) by binnacle.wantabe.com (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id MAA89234 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 1999 12:42:33 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from jeffrl@wantabe.com) X-Authentication-Warning: binnacle.wantabe.com: jeffrl owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 12:42:33 -0500 (CDT) From: "Jeffrey J. Libman" To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: re: routing over a dual t1 connection (fwd) Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG hi. currently my connection is over a single line (isdn), using a unix box and gated with rip/rip2 protocol and what is basically static routes. i now have the opportunity to move to a t1, possibly 2 t1's. i don NOT wish at this time to multi-home my net, but to put both t1's into my upstream provider in order to get the bandwidth. i understand how routing over 2 interfaces works when you are dual homed, using an as number and bgp4, etc. how do i effect routing over 2 interfaces, when i want them to be, in effect, 1 interface, double the bandwidth? is this the "balancing" i keep seeing threads about on this list? any pointers will be appreciated. thanks in advance. cheers, jeff | |\ +------------------------------+ Jeffrey J. Libman, ops. mgr. | \ | Wantabe Internet Services | Wantabe, Inc. |__\ +------------------------------+ jeffrl@wantabe.com <-----|------> | access web cgi ftp news mail | (281) 493-0718 __,.-=\'`^`'~=-../__,.-= +------------------------------+ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message