From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 10 20:00:32 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B410A16A4D5 for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 20:00:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from www.portaone.com (support.portaone.com [195.70.151.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D529743D3F for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 20:00:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sobomax@portaone.com) Received: from [192.168.1.26] (SIRIUS-ats227-UTC.ukrtel.net [195.5.25.154]) (authenticated bits=0) by www.portaone.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j1AJnIvo030234 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 10 Feb 2005 20:49:20 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from sobomax@portaone.com) Message-ID: <420BBAAD.4030109@portaone.com> Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 21:49:01 +0200 From: Maxim Sobolev Organization: Porta Software Ltd User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Julian Elischer References: <20050209205943.34c39e15.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> <420A838B.9050600@portaone.com> <420BB5E3.1080504@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <420BB5E3.1080504@elischer.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.80/685/Wed Jan 26 10:08:24 2005 clamav-milter version 0.80j on www.portaone.com X-Virus-Status: Clean cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: MySQL benchmarks X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 20:00:32 -0000 Julian Elischer wrote: > > > Maxim Sobolev wrote: > >> The difference between linux and everything else in those tests is so >> significant even on UP, so that I suspect that something wrong with >> the approach. > > > > no, I believe it to be accurate. however Mysql in default config is very > well > tuned for Linux, and you have to admit that 2.6 is a very nice kernel in > some ways. Actually article shows that there is very little difference between 2.4 and 2.6 even on SMP, which makes me very suspicious, as 2.4 employ the same giant lock model as FreeBSD 4.11 does. -Maxim