From owner-freebsd-current  Thu Oct  8 13:42:26 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA15004
          for freebsd-current-outgoing; Thu, 8 Oct 1998 13:42:26 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from austin.polstra.com (austin.polstra.com [206.213.73.10])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA14921
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Thu, 8 Oct 1998 13:41:49 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from jdp@austin.polstra.com)
Received: from austin.polstra.com (jdp@localhost)
	by austin.polstra.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA24112;
	Thu, 8 Oct 1998 13:37:18 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jdp)
Message-Id: <199810082037.NAA24112@austin.polstra.com>
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>
cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Is tickadj still required in -CURRENT ? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 08 Oct 1998 21:25:15 +0200."
    <7034.907874715@critter.freebsd.dk> 
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 1998 13:37:18 -0700
From: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> Uhm, sorry, no longer true, tickadj has nothing what so ever to do
> with what time it is any more...

Not even on 486 machines?  Sorry, I was mistaken then.

John

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message