From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 28 03:23:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9E0216A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 03:23:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.des.no (flood.des.no [217.116.83.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9957543D2D for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 03:23:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: by smtp.des.no (Pony Express, from userid 666) id 99E65530D; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 12:23:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37]) by smtp.des.no (Pony Express) with ESMTP id DA6E55310; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 12:22:45 +0100 (CET) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id C33A233C6A; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 12:22:45 +0100 (CET) To: "Imam Akhadi" References: From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 12:22:45 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Imam Akhadi's message of "Wed, 28 Jan 2004 10:20:32 +0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090024 (Oort Gnus v0.24) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on flood.des.no X-Spam-Level: ss X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK, RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.61 cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can't First Install FreeBSD 5.2 Release X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 11:23:06 -0000 "Imam Akhadi" writes: > I was install FreeBSD 5.2 on Hewlett Packard [...] FreeBSD 5.2 is not -STABLE; you should ask on the -current list instead, and Cc: the -scsi list since this is a SCSI problem. > Can someone tell me whether or not this is indicative of a hardware, or=20 > software, problem?=20 It looks like a problem related to tagged queueing. It's possible that your drives have bugs in their tag handling, or that there is a bug in the FreeBSD SCSI code. Turning tagged queueing off or limiting the depth of the queue might help, but it will also reduce disk performance. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no