From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 29 05:37:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A86F916A400 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 05:37:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from cobalt.antimatter.net (cobalt.antimatter.net [69.55.224.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6501143D45 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 05:37:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from foo.antimatter.net (cpe-72-132-240-21.san.res.rr.com [72.132.240.21]) (authenticated bits=0) by cobalt.antimatter.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k2T5bctD014925 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 28 Mar 2006 21:37:39 -0800 X-MailKey: purple frogs are falling from the sky Message-Id: <7.0.1.0.2.20060328213006.0764dd48@antimatter.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0 Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 21:35:34 -0800 To: Mikhail Teterin From: Glenn Dawson In-Reply-To: <200603290026.36453@aldan> References: <200603281422.57389.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> <200603282154.40174.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> <7.0.1.0.2.20060328190500.08134e88@antimatter.net> <200603290026.36453@aldan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: questions@freebsd.org, Derek Ragona Subject: Re: virtusertable blocking seems to have no effect X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 05:37:48 -0000 At 09:26 PM 3/28/2006, Mikhail Teterin wrote: >On Tuesday 28 March 2006 10:09 pm, Glenn Dawson wrote: >= I use this in my virtusertable: >= foo@bar.com error:nouser 550 No such user here >= >= but you should be able to change the message half of that with no trouble. > >Please, review this thread from the beginning. I want some of the foos to be >accepted and forwarded, but all other @bar.com addresses to trigger a no-spam >response. I saw that, but you had that part right...I thought the only problem was with getting the reject message to work properly. Anyway... This is what I typically do: foo@bar.com localaccount1 bar@bar.com localaccount2 @bar.com error:nouser 550 No such user here Note that the order of the entries is important, the catch-all has to be at the end. Organizationally, I typically keep all the @bar.com type entries at the end of the file and group the others before those in whatever way makes the most sense. -Glenn > -mi --- "Go that way, really fast. If something gets in your way, turn."