From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 11 18:02:33 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CE0416A4CE; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 18:02:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pittgoth.com (14.zlnp1.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.149.111]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97C4543D39; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 18:02:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mobile.pittgoth.com (64-144-75-100.client.dsl.net [64.144.75.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by pittgoth.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j0BI2Roa051158 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 11 Jan 2005 13:02:28 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 13:02:35 -0500 From: Tom Rhodes To: Warner Losh Message-ID: <20050111130235.4f060449@mobile.pittgoth.com> In-Reply-To: <20050111.104104.41659378.imp@harmony.village.org> References: <200501111640.j0BGeTpT086101@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050111170322.GA2518@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> <20050111120547.0344702c@mobile.pittgoth.com> <20050111.104104.41659378.imp@harmony.village.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.13 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.3) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/libexec/rtld-aout shlib.c shlib.h support.c support.h X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 18:02:33 -0000 On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 10:41:04 -0700 (MST) Warner Losh wrote: > > No problem. I'm not sure why my local build tests didn't pick > > this breakage but it happens. I still feel bad breaking world > > for everyone again. :( > > The only way to know for sure is to have a spare, scratch machine that > you check out the committed sources from and build from scratch on. > Otherwise you can't be sure that you don't have something > uncommitted/weird about your machine. Very inconvenient :-(. > > Second best is to checkout into a clean tree and build there. Sounds like a lot better plan. Only difficulty I could (untested theory) see would be multiple versions n'stuff. :) -- Tom Rhodes