From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 13 10:48:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CDD316A420 for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 10:48:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (cain.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AAD943D68 for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 10:48:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from inchoate.gsoft.com.au (ppp133-7.lns2.adl2.internode.on.net [59.167.133.7]) (authenticated bits=0) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.13.5/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jBDAlrEQ058219 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 13 Dec 2005 21:17:54 +1030 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 21:17:41 +1030 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <439E9FBD.8090406@cytexbg.com> In-Reply-To: <439E9FBD.8090406@cytexbg.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart8661115.gi6kduSHta"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200512132117.47915.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> X-Spam-Score: 0 () X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.54 on 203.31.81.10 Cc: Subject: Re: devfs.rules and serial devices question X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 10:48:06 -0000 --nextPart8661115.gi6kduSHta Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 20:47, Niki Denev wrote: > perm ttyd0 0660 > own ttyd0 upsd:upsd > > But it still does not work because ttyd0.init and ttyd0.lock > are still owned by root. So? > I'll try adding them too to the devfs.rules file, > but i'm wondering if this is the expected behaviour of devfs? Yes. > I think that maybe it will be better if one specify ttyd0 in the > file, that rule also to apply for ttyd0.init and ttyd0.lock files. > What do you think? I don't see why your program needs to open .init and .lock files. Both of=20 those are pretty much exclusively for administrator use. NUT should definitely work without being able to open them. =2D-=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C --nextPart8661115.gi6kduSHta Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBDnqbT5ZPcIHs/zowRAvDOAJ9PPH5zLBnrXw2y93Y5HVIf1unaBgCfVPnJ XWCSLKukqcEA3q3y1fSa6hg= =OwiO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart8661115.gi6kduSHta--