From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Aug 30 17:47:58 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 5267016A4CE; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 17:47:58 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from web.portaone.com (web.portaone.com [195.70.151.35])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 7771B43D2D; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 17:47:57 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from sobomax@portaone.com)
Received: from [192.168.0.20] (portacare.portaone.com [195.140.247.242])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by web.portaone.com (8.12.8p2/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i7UHlsPR095815
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Mon, 30 Aug 2004 19:47:56 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from sobomax@portaone.com)
Message-ID: <4133683A.3090201@portaone.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 20:47:38 +0300
From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@portaone.com>
Organization: Porta Software Ltd
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (Windows/20040803)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: sos@freebsd.org, "current@freebsd.org" <current@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: burncd(8) usability: why `-s max' isn't default?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 17:47:58 -0000

Hi,

I wonder if there are any compelling reasons why `-s max' is not default 
behaviour of burncd(8). IMHO, there is no point to have default of 4. 
Usually, today's drives are smart enough to select the maximum speed 
supported both by drive and by the medium.

-Maxim