From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Sep 11 01:24:17 2003
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id F050516A4BF; Thu, 11 Sep 2003 01:24:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.broadpark.no (mail.broadpark.no [217.13.4.2])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id E09E243FCB; Thu, 11 Sep 2003 01:24:16 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: from smtp.des.no (37.80-203-228.nextgentel.com [80.203.228.37])
	by mail.broadpark.no (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id DDDAD7927C; Thu, 11 Sep 2003 10:24:15 +0200 (MEST)
Received: by smtp.des.no (Pony Express, from userid 666)
	id A730498204; Thu, 11 Sep 2003 10:24:15 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from dwp.des.no (dwp.des.no [10.0.0.4])
	by smtp.des.no (Pony Express) with ESMTP
	id 5188D9760E; Thu, 11 Sep 2003 10:24:11 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 2602)
	id 33506B822; Thu, 11 Sep 2003 10:24:11 +0200 (CEST)
To: Jake Burkholder <jake@FreeBSD.org>
References: <200309110014.h8B0EHOX044603@repoman.freebsd.org>
From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=)
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 10:24:11 +0200
In-Reply-To: <200309110014.h8B0EHOX044603@repoman.freebsd.org> (Jake
 Burkholder's message of "Wed, 10 Sep 2003 17:14:17 -0700 (PDT)")
Message-ID: <xzpisnz68d0.fsf@dwp.des.no>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090024 (Oort Gnus v0.24) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=8.0
	tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,
	      REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,RISK_FREE,USER_AGENT_GNUS_UA
	version=2.55
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)
cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org
cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org
cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc/etc.sparc64 ttys
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 08:24:18 -0000

Jake Burkholder <jake@FreeBSD.org> writes:
>   Log:
>   Changed the ttyd entries to ttyu, which correspond to the device nodes
>   created by uart(4).

Is there a good reason for uart to use ttyu instead of ttyd?  There's
no risk of conflict even if both uart and sio are present, thanks to
devfs, so why not use the traditional name?

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no