Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 01:24:17 +0000 From: "nvass-gmx.com (Nikos Vassiliadis)" <phabric-noreply@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: [Differential] [Commented On] D1944: PF and VIMAGE fixes Message-ID: <b319eb6fb7b1c6d0042f842e1c534fa9@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <differential-rev-PHID-DREV-clct73g5zt63yh3lvwzr-req@FreeBSD.org> References: <differential-rev-PHID-DREV-clct73g5zt63yh3lvwzr-req@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
nvass-gmx.com added a comment. >>! In D1944#11, @kristof wrote: > Don't we still need to do all of this somewhere? >>! In D1944#11, @kristof wrote: > Don't we still need to do all of this somewhere? INLINE COMMENTS sys/netpfil/pf/pf_ioctl.c:325 pf_unload is called before pf_vnet_unit, this is why we do very little things in pf_unload. We need everything until the last vnet is destroyed. sys/netpfil/pf/pf_ioctl.c:3725 The patch includes per-VNET initialization, so this is not need anymore. pf_vnet_init() handles all per-VNET initialization, including DEFAULT_VNET. REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1944 To: nvass-gmx.com, gnn, bz, zec, trociny, glebius, rodrigc, kristof Cc: freebsd-virtualization, freebsd-pf, freebsd-net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?b319eb6fb7b1c6d0042f842e1c534fa9>