From owner-freebsd-ports Wed May 8 14:40:29 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 760C737B414 for ; Wed, 8 May 2002 14:40:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g48Le5g88150; Wed, 8 May 2002 14:40:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 14:40:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200205082140.g48Le5g88150@freefall.freebsd.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Jacob Subject: Re: ports/36789: openssh port will not compile, checksum error Reply-To: Jacob Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/36789; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Jacob To: "David W. Chapman Jr." Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, dinoex@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/36789: openssh port will not compile, checksum error Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 23:34:52 +0200 On Wed, 08 May 2002 10:01:12 -0500 "David W. Chapman Jr." wrote: > I believe the new file will be redownloaded during package building, but > the port doesn't look at ftp.freebsd.org for the patch it goes to > openbsd, so it doesn't need to be updated, does it? I have re-examined this tonight and I think you are right. This bug (different patches on different sites) was trigged due to my faulty configuration in /etc/make.conf. I had a MASTER_SITES_OVERRIDE pointing to a local site (ftp.se.freebsd.org) to speed up the download. I should probably have used MASTER_SORT_REGEX to give local sites priority instead. The correct version of the patch file (openbsd28_3.1.patch) has propagated out now anyway so I suggest we close this problem report. kind regards, /jacob To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message