Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 30 Jun 2003 09:51:22 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu>
To:        Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>
Cc:        freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: API change for bus_dma
Message-ID:  <16128.16474.899328.333628@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
In-Reply-To: <3EFD574B.9419EE71@mindspring.com>
References:  <3EF3C12F.9060303@btc.adaptec.com> <16124.39930.142492.356163@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <3EFC9F2D.6020908@btc.adaptec.com> <16124.43999.333761.397624@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <3EFCAC7A.6060305@btc.adaptec.com> <16124.45051.919899.414795@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <16124.46454.595892.860118@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <3EFD492A.60C18556@mindspring.com> <20030628080448.GI55920@funkthat.com> <3EFD574B.9419EE71@mindspring.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

Terry Lambert writes:
 > was attempting to address was related to whether or not the memory
 > in question was physically vs. logically contiguous:
 > 

No, its whether or not its cache-coherent.  We do everything at a
page granularity, and could care less about whether or not the memory
is contiguous.

Drew



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?16128.16474.899328.333628>