From owner-freebsd-libh@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 18 22:07:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-libh@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7226B16A4CE for ; Tue, 18 May 2004 22:07:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.elcat.kg (imap.elcat.kg [212.42.96.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84E0E43D54 for ; Tue, 18 May 2004 22:07:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from warlock@voip.kg) Received: by mail.elcat.kg (Postfix, from userid 6000) id 471893F5557; Wed, 19 May 2004 11:07:22 +0600 (KGST) Received: from warcomp.elcat.kg (warcomp.elcat.kg [212.42.96.26]) by mail.elcat.kg (Postfix) with ESMTP id 144FA3F5542 for ; Wed, 19 May 2004 11:07:22 +0600 (KGST) From: Roman Streltsov Organization: Elcat To: freebsd-libh@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 11:07:21 +0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <00d701c43c85$0ca36bd0$6501a8c0@yourw92p4bhlzg> <20040518171751.GA58065@shall.anarcat.ath.cx> In-Reply-To: <20040518171751.GA58065@shall.anarcat.ath.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200405191107.21528.warlock@voip.kg> Subject: Re: question X-BeenThere: freebsd-libh@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Dedicated to libh code development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 05:07:32 -0000 On Tuesday 18 May 2004 23:17, The Anarcat wrote: > I actually feel libh hinders real improvements of the packaging system > by giving a false hope of a coming revelation. :) It was first destination of project, it isn't? How about to return? Handy package system with powerfull upgrade and interface aspects looks too actual now. Thanx for attention