From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 6 13:57:39 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0160416A4CE for ; Sat, 6 Dec 2003 13:57:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.mho.com (smtp.mho.net [64.58.4.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EC17343FBF for ; Sat, 6 Dec 2003 13:57:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) Received: (qmail 39915 invoked by uid 1002); 6 Dec 2003 21:57:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO freebsd.org) (64.58.1.252) by smtp.mho.net with SMTP; 6 Dec 2003 21:57:29 -0000 Message-ID: <3FD25084.3070504@freebsd.org> Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2003 14:56:20 -0700 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031103 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: obrien@freebsd.org References: <0F89A7EF-274F-11D8-B8AD-000502C708CB@sitetronics.com> <20031205135606.U87691@carver.gumbysoft.com> <20031205160702.A71074@pooker.samsco.home> <20031206214041.GB9434@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20031206214041.GB9434@dragon.nuxi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org cc: "Devon H. O'Dell" cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: New sparc64 5.2-BETA ISO images available X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2003 21:57:39 -0000 David O'Brien wrote: > On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 04:09:16PM -0700, Scott Long wrote: > >>Yes, the U1e and U2 machines need the esp(4) driver from NetBSD. I'm in >>the middle of porting it right now, but it will still take some time. >>Netbooting these machines works very well for me at the moment; a >>netbooted U2 builds world faster than an Alpha XP1000 with a local disk. > > > eh? My 'make world' times on a Compaq XP1000 is faster than my Sun Blade > 100 500mhz. I certainly won't believe a 300mhz diskless machine will > beat that. What were the actual times? > It's a dual 300MHz machine with lots of RAM. I don't have the times anymore, all I know is that both were started within a minute of each other and the sparc finished 5 minutes sooner. Anyway, my point was that just because it's diskless doesn't mean that it's useless. Scott