Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 22:35:02 -0000 From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> To: Eric Anholt <eta@lclark.edu> Cc: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> Subject: Re: support for __thread Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10312211732260.24264-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> In-Reply-To: <1072045740.689.6.camel@leguin>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 21 Dec 2003, Eric Anholt wrote: > On Sun, 2003-12-21 at 12:08, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > On Sun, 21 Dec 2003, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > > > > * Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> [031221 02:47] wrote: > > > > How do I get __thread to work for me? > > > > > > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Thread-Local.html > > > > > > > > it seems the assembler chokes on it? > > > > We don't have support for it yet. Why do you want it? > > From what I understand, having thread-local variables would be a big > bonus for OpenGL. Yes, it was folks from Nvidia that urged us to support this. This probably better belongs on -current; some developers don't read -hackers. -- Dan Eischen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.10.10312211732260.24264-100000>