From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 10 16:29:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8D1B16A4CE; Mon, 10 May 2004 16:29:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pittgoth.com (14.zlnp1.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.149.111]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1CE443D4C; Mon, 10 May 2004 16:29:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([192.168.0.5]) (authenticated bits=0) by pittgoth.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i4ANTj0i064084 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 10 May 2004 19:29:45 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 19:30:13 -0400 From: Tom Rhodes To: "Simon L. Nielsen" Message-Id: <20040510193013.6fdcf002@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20040510231850.GA844@zaphod.nitro.dk> References: <20040510165153.37575e53@localhost> <20040510231850.GA844@zaphod.nitro.dk> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.10claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FreeBSD-doc@FreeBSD.org cc: Robert Watson Subject: Re: [REVIEW REQUEST]: New chapter on MAC (draft) X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 23:29:46 -0000 On Tue, 11 May 2004 01:18:50 +0200 "Simon L. Nielsen" wrote: > On 2004.05.10 16:51:53 -0400, Tom Rhodes wrote: > > Hey FreeBSD-doc, > > > > I've written a new chapter for the handbook on implementing the > > MAC features in 5.X. It includes configuration, testing, module > > description that augments the section we already have, and shows > > examples of the policies. > > In general: great! :-). I have been looking at the MAC label policies a > few times without really understanding how they were suposed to work. > It has helped a lot to read this chapter! That was the intention! Thanks! > > > I'm not worried about whitespace right now, only correctness in the > > information presented, markup, and wording. > > I have some comments below. I will try to go over it again tomorrow in > more detail to give more comments. I'll merge these then; a quick review of your comments shows that you're correct. Someone new won't know the difference between 'subject' and 'object'. I'll get that tonight. My only question is about the comments on the portacl policy, but I'm sure that will come to light once you've sent in either a patch or comments. I don't suggest patch because I'll be working on this tonight. :) > > BTW, there are some parts that are indented, which shouldn't be > (not mentioned below since it is more or less whitespace). Yea, the whitespace will be 'clean' on my commit. A lot of it looks downright horrible and misaligned. I was more concerned with 'information' and 'correctness' than anything else. -- Tom Rhodes