From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 23 08:18:41 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B0D616A4B3 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 08:18:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailbox.univie.ac.at (mailbox.univie.ac.at [131.130.1.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 031B743FDF for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 08:18:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from l.ertl@univie.ac.at) Received: from wireless (adslle.cc.univie.ac.at [131.130.102.11]) by mailbox.univie.ac.at (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id h9NFIStC274174 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 17:18:31 +0200 Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 17:11:55 +0200 (CEST) From: Lukas Ertl To: current@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20031021155703.J98807@pcle2.cc.univie.ac.at> Message-ID: <20031023171047.Q619@korben.in.tern> References: <20031021155703.J98807@pcle2.cc.univie.ac.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-DCC-ZID-Univie-Metrics: mailbox 4243; Body=0 Fuz1=0 Fuz2=0 Subject: Re: em0: invalid EEPROM checksum X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 15:18:41 -0000 On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, Lukas Ertl wrote: > I just found that the em0 interface in one of my boxes stopped working > after an upgrade from 5.1-RELEASE to 5.1-CURRENT, this is what the kernel > spits out: > > $ dmesg | grep em0 > em0: port > 0xb000-0xb03f mem 0xe2000000-0xe201ffff irq 12 at device 5.0 on pci2 > em0: [MPSAFE] > em0: The EEPROM Checksum Is Not Valid > em0: Unable to initialize the hardware > device_probe_and_attach: em0 attach returned 5 Oh, I forgot to add, this is what pciconf has to say about it: none3@pci2:5:0: class=0x020000 card=0x002e8086 chip=0x100e8086 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82544XT PRO/1000 MT Gigabit Ethernet Controller' class = network subclass = ethernet A solution would be highly appriciated. regards, le -- Lukas Ertl eMail: l.ertl@univie.ac.at UNIX Systemadministrator Tel.: (+43 1) 4277-14073 Vienna University Computer Center Fax.: (+43 1) 4277-9140 University of Vienna http://mailbox.univie.ac.at/~le/