From owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 20 14:06:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB0801065696; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 14:06:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gw0-f54.google.com (mail-gw0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4034B8FC18; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 14:06:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gwb15 with SMTP id 15so1657637gwb.13 for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 07:06:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=xQa5jN83EEc5jo9s97ZajSxo7h56nuNnP53SBwSNbQg=; b=ueYWbfQzVgwwWpZjj683rk74Z27DYYDaT3CG+UO8kswUtBVA3ghV0Y8MTeUEh/nSaH oF0e3mhqtm17OmqYoP6sfI7AiuFAxpyoi77hE4XT0vWebGjZHRTI4EuEWN5ifEP1hwNB KwiUOJXC7YHS1B1ZkIksD2vB3IEc/k9W88CxI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=RGfAsYgrRdiT/TUHNdmclfemB/HFX5OCo543nPejLbslMCBZEoHeuPdrmxfZOlcn4B WgHrSBXVJ+dMUmSnsauibZxsTWt6u3u8A7WVUzOEsPsOHJtASz4uvYFxTo304FZiSfy6 RbmbtuSqlL2Tsyq37l5bzJ4kK9Bn1VgD/y6s0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.178.2 with SMTP id a2mr9159880ybf.250.1284991613502; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 07:06:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.156.206 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 07:06:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201009200925.10362.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <201009200925.10362.jhb@freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 22:06:53 +0800 Message-ID: From: Adrian Chadd To: John Baldwin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFT: if_ath HAL refactoring X-BeenThere: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Mobile computing with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 14:06:54 -0000 On 20 September 2010 21:25, John Baldwin wrote: > Why not include this iff both 'device ath' and 'device pci' are included? > That is what is normally done for bus-specific attachments. I've not idea right now whether there's an Atheros SoC with an AHB-attached wireless device and a PCI bus. In fact, that won't work at the present time because the device names would clash. I'm happy to do that in whatever form the eventual merged codebase takes. Adrian