Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 14:21:07 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 227577] security/py-fail2ban: writes '_ip_value' to /etc/hosts.deny instead of the banned IP address Message-ID: <bug-227577-7788-PMYdiD2yxl@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-227577-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-227577-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D227577 theis@gmx.at changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|maintainer-feedback?(theis@ |maintainer-feedback+ |gmx.at) | --- Comment #5 from theis@gmx.at --- Attached is a patch.=20 Problem was that variables used in the fail2ban actions my not start with an "_". This was fixed upstream. Other problems are differences between stock FreeBSD "sed" and Linux GNU "s= ed": they differ in the way arguments are applied and in regular expressions. So= me of them could be solved upstream, some of them cannot. To make things more complicated FreeBSD ports have a GNU sed people may have installed. In orde= r to avoid a dependency on ports gsed and avoid conflicts between stock and ports versions I changed "sed" to "/usr/bin/sed". If that is not the proper way to enforce using stock sed please tell me. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-227577-7788-PMYdiD2yxl>