Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 15 Apr 2004 21:11:28 +0200
From:      des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=)
To:        Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
Cc:        arch@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: installing multiple kernels
Message-ID:  <xzpoept9hun.fsf@dwp.des.no>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0404151151040.49848-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> (Julian Elischer's message of "Thu, 15 Apr 2004 11:51:35 -0700 (PDT)")
References:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0404151151040.49848-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> writes:
> On Thu, 15 Apr 2004, [iso-8859-1] Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote:
> > that is a completely different issue - and it probably won't work
> > since modules are now built (at least to some extent) using the
> > "parent" kernel's option headers.
> They are?
>
> when did that breakage occur?

sys/conf/kmod.mk revision 1.145, and possibly others.  More recently,
this feature caused the twa module breakage - when built with a
kernel, it picked up the kernel's opt_ipx.h, but when built standalone
(or with world) it didn't have an opt_ipx.h to use.  Vinod only tested
the common case, so MODULES_WITH_WORLD broke.

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpoept9hun.fsf>